.
Left and Right don't get it. They blame us! They still do not understand who is insane, nor do they understand that the only authority that has value is the one that does not rely on force, the one inside each of us, the "I AM."

Left: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30herbert.html?hp

Right: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/opinion/30brooks.html?hp

The NY Times shows that Paulson & Co. are continuing to use the tools they've had. One wonders why any bailout was needed since they already are printing a series of "supplemental" Treasury securities "and there is no limit to how many more it can issue and sell." Sell to the FED? Perhaps. Sell to you or me or foreign investors? Very doubtful.

See Paragraph 5: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/30/business/30plan.html?hp

So was the "bailout" an outright theft? Was it about public confidence? Was it a raw power grab fueled by deliberate threats of imminent collapse? Maybe all of the above, depending on the individual player's motivations.

All this confirms once again that Government is not the way to go ro solve this mess, or any other challenge we face. Who needs a bunch of ignorant, fearful, panicky representatives to tell us what to do! We are just as capable, or incapable. Why complicate life!

The sooner we get rid of all these scoundrels and return to actual Self-Government, the sooner we'll invent and rebirth America.
.

.

.

Decent video - note the comments by Dallas FED Fisher and the statement that we are going to need our resources for ourselves, first, to get through this mess, so why give them to Paulson & Co.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64VedbQbRro&eurl=http://market- ticker.denninger.net/archives/592-Goodbye-Ben-How-Many-in-Congress- Have-a-Pair.html

As for where to part money safely, I think we are boing to experience Evil Eye Fleegle's Triple Whammy. Those of you old enough to remember Al Capp and 'Lil Abner will remember Evil Eye who on Sundays crossed paths with Dick Tracy.

In this case we first have debt deflation and bank failures. People rush into T-Bills. Then we have the unbelievable, the disappearance of a secondary market for T-Bills similar to the disappearance of the auction market for municipal bands a few month ago. You've got your T-Bill but no one will buy it from you at least not at a price you are willing to accept. Then comes the Tsunami, the triple of the triple whammy - hyperinflation, wiping out your T-Bill at a moment when you cannot turn it into anything liquid.

Terrible scenario. Entirely possible.

For those who prefer silver, please note:


Unconfirmed but explosive for PM's if true:

The Sensible Swiss

This week I received an e-mail from a Swiss money manager, a friend and trusted source. He informed me that a very large and conservative Swiss bank had informed a number of their clients that they would no longer be offered paper gold or silver certificates in the bank's name. It seems the bank had previously granted the accounts because it was able to protect itself against an upside move with a derivatives contract with another financial institution. Due to the financial turmoil, the bank was no longer comfortable with the counterparty risk from the other financial institution. Instead, the Swiss bank informed its clients, all paper transactions had to be converted to physical or physical ETF positions (There are Swiss ETFs for gold and silver). My friend informed me that other Swiss banks were likely to follow this bank's lead.

As long-time readers know, the issue of bank silver certificates that were not backed by real metal is one I have written about frequently

In essence, the banks that issued such certificates were short the metal, and taking an enormous risk in the event of a sharp price rise. Because they had been issued for decades, the cumulative amount of the short position in silver amounted to, perhaps, billions of ounces. This was a short position separate and distinct from the massive COMEX short position. (my emphasis)

That the large and conservative Swiss bank is seeking to reduce or eliminate it's short exposure to silver at this time makes sense. The bank has seen that silver prices can move sharply higher and that counterparty guarantees can vanish in an instant. It is sensible and practical that it would take such actions now, after silver prices moved sharply lower.

The resultant move by former paper owners of silver into real metal is destined to put additional pressure on the existing supplies of metal. It is hard to imagine a more critical time for this to occur than now. Every indication is one of tightness in the physical silver supply. The potential creation of a brand new source of silver physical demand could be profound.

.